Part of the guide: Network Marketing Lead Generation
Editor Notes: the company iLearningGlobal.tv stopped being an MLM company on March 17th, 2010, and turned their backs on their distributors, stealing incomes of all of their top reps, including myself. Because of that, they are worthy of the ‘hall of shame’ in the Network Marketing profession, and my opinion is that no one should ever do business with either them or their other company, DailySuccessStream.com again.
Are you looking for the fastest growing team in iLearningGlobal?
That may not be the right question to ask.
In this video, I explain the key elements of the team that you should be looking for, as well as how you can prosper in the iLearningGlobal business by working with a system that is right for your strengths, weaknesses, goals, and ambitions.
The first thought that I have for you when looking for the right team to select when working with the company is that it may be in your best interest to take an inventory of your personal abilities and to think about how you would like your business to look in five years.
Are you an excellent presenter? Or are you better at creative writing?
Are you excellent on the phone? Do you want to be on the phone for five hours a day for the rest of your life? Do you like to travel non-stop? Or would you rather have more control over your time?
These are all important thoughts to have if you’re thinking about joining iLearningGlobal. There are a lot of great teams, and a lot of great systems, but they don’t work right for everyone.
If you would like to see a system that I personally use to generate 150 or more iLearningGlobal leads every day, visit my team website at: Quantumclub.ai
P.S. Leave me your thoughts, comments, and questions below.
In prosperity,
David Wood
Comments
Calix Olvera
Thank you for sharing this valuable information. I’ve been looking for a team that aligns with my goals in iLearningGlobal, and this has given me clarity!
Amaris Quintero
I appreciate your honesty about iLearningGlobal and their shift in business. It’s important to know what you’re getting into before making decisions in network marketing.
Michael Anders
This post was truly insightful! I’ve been thinking of joining a team in iLearningGlobal, and your advice about considering personal strengths and long-term goals really resonated with me. Thanks for the tips!
You have been paid late before
You have watched the number on the dashboard not match the number in your account. What is different now is simple: it settles on a public contract you can check yourself, not a dashboard I control.
Read the contract →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
Amanda Cruz
I’m a bit skeptical about iLearningGlobal, especially with what happened in 2010. Do you have any evidence to back up the claims about them turning their back on their distributors?
Sarah Thompson
Could you explain a bit more about how the lead generation system works for your team? I’m curious about what sets your team apart from others in iLearningGlobal.
David Hall
While I appreciate your perspective, I think it’s essential to acknowledge that not every system works for everyone. Do you think this approach might be too tailored for specific personalities?
Emily Lopez
This is such a helpful post! It’s been a while since we’ve caught up. How have you been? We should meet up sometime and discuss more on these marketing strategies!
Carlos Rivera
Your post reminded me of a similar challenge I faced when trying to grow my team in another MLM. It’s hard to find the right system that works for everyone, but your advice on aligning personal strengths is spot on.
Laura Mitchell
I recently came across a tool called HubSpot CRM, which is quite effective for lead generation and customer management. It might complement your system well. Have you heard of it?
Oliver Martin
I’ve learned a lot from this post! Understanding my strengths before joining a team is something I hadn’t considered deeply. Thanks for sharing this approach, it has been eye-opening!
Three posts a day. One email a day.
Everything I publish, in one short daily email. Real numbers, no hype, unsubscribe in one click.
Get paid 100%, on-chain, the second the sale clears
Most affiliates earn little, and that is disclosed up front. The difference here is not a promise about what you will make. It is that you can verify every payout yourself, on a public contract, in about twelve seconds.
See how the payout works →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
The editor’s note up top does more work than the rest of the post combined.
Roy’s right that the note carries the weight here, but I think what’s being missed is the advice underneath it still stands on its own, separate from what happened to this particular company. Take an inventory of your own strengths before picking a team, that’s sound regardless of which company you’re reading it about, and it would have been sound advice even for people who ended up burned by iLearningGlobal specifically.
Stripped to what’s actually actionable here, since the company context is now moot: 1) know your own strengths before choosing a team or system 2) decide upfront how much phone time you actually want in your life 3) match your system to your temperament, not the other way round. What’s missing is any framework for how to tell, in advance, whether the company itself is stable enough to be worth matching a system to at all.
We called that due diligence question something else in every decade I’ve watched this industry, and the answer’s always been the same: you mostly can’t tell from outside, and the people inside usually can’t either until it’s too late to matter.
There’s something almost poignant about a ‘the fastest growing team’ headline sitting directly under a note explaining the company collapsed on its own distributors four years after this was written. Makes you wonder how many of these posts, across every company in this space, are quietly one editor’s note away from reading the exact same way.
Spent six years building a team in a similar structure before walking away, and I’ll say plainly what I still think worked, since it’s easy to only talk about the exit. Matching people to a role that suited how they actually liked to work, the way this post describes, genuinely reduced churn on my team. What I didn’t see coming was how much the company itself could change the terms under you, no matter how well you’d matched people internally. The post’s own editor’s note is proof of exactly that risk, and it’s worth reading as a cautionary case study rather than dismissing the whole thing on either side.
Look. It’s not poignant, it’s the pattern.
A company grows fast enough that someone writes ‘fastest growing team’ about it, and growing that fast is usually the first sign the foundation isn’t built to hold the weight. Fine, not always. But often enough that ‘this one’s different’ should trigger scepticism, not excitement, every single time you read it.