Part of the guide: Network Marketing Lead Generation
In my opinion, both are equally important if you’re goal is to be successful in Network Marketing. The reason I say that is this, you can be part of a GREAT company but if your inner circle is weak you’ll have a long journey to success. If you’re in an MLM company you will agree that this is an industry of duplication.
Ask yourself: Who have you been duplicating?
Does that person or group of people reflect the vision that you have for your future?
If the answer is no, the reality is that you’re on your own my friend. Now don’t misunderstand what I’m saying here, you can definitely become successful on your own but the power of an inner circle will expedite the process.
I’ve been blessed to work with a powerful group of individuals that have absolutely aided in my road to success. The inner circle I’ve built is irreplaceable and I give tons of gratitude to everyone that I’ve worked with outside of my circle.
See, what you’re looking for in an MLM Company is a solid product, reputable owners, great leadership, and a top notch training system. Anything more is just icing on the cake.
In addition to great leadership, regular training sessions, and a family-like relationship, the inner circle you’re looking for must have a duplicatable system that is scalable. That is the foundation that will put you on the beaches of the world so long as you stick to the system long enough.
In my opinion, the best duplicatable system is an automated one.
The reason I say that is because I’ve built an organization before using a system that wasn’t automated. I discovered that the information that my front line was given was not the same information that my 5th and 6th level was given.
I found myself on the phone 24/7 manually trying to create duplication throughout my entire team. Like many of you, I personally got involved in this industry to enjoy time freedom with my friends and family. I had no time and no freedom.
I’m glad that those days are over as my team is now experiencing massive duplication thanks to the automated system that we have in place.
Ulysses Spellman
Your Network Marketing Professional
Comments
Alice Whittaker
This is such an insightful post! I totally agree with your points about the importance of both the MLM company and the inner circle. Having a strong network truly accelerates success. Keep up the amazing work!
Thomas Gallagher
I’m honestly skeptical about the claims here. How do you know that an automated system is the best way to duplicate success in MLM? Do you have any concrete examples or data to back this up?
You have been paid late before
You have watched the number on the dashboard not match the number in your account. What is different now is simple: it settles on a public contract you can check yourself, not a dashboard I control.
Read the contract →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
Samantha Wells
Thank you for sharing this! I’ve been struggling with duplication in my team, and your post helped me realize that I might be missing the “inner circle” element. Could you provide more details on how to find a good circle?
Gregory Hunt
While I see the value in both the MLM company and the inner circle, I think the automated systems might be oversold here. Not every system fits all businesses. I’d love to hear more about your experiences with different systems.
Nina Powell
Wow, this brings back memories! I remember when we worked together a few years ago. Your points are spot on as always. We should definitely catch up soon – maybe another mastermind session?
Michael Donovan
Your post resonated with me. I faced the same issues with team duplication until I implemented an automated system. It completely transformed how my business runs. Thanks for validating this approach!
Rachel Adams
If you’re looking for tools similar to the automated system you mentioned, you might want to check out HubSpot, Zoho, or ActiveCampaign. They offer great automation for marketing and network building!
Luis Fernandez
I learned so much from this post! I never considered the significance of an inner circle before, but now I understand its impact on success. Thank you for the valuable insights!
Three posts a day. One email a day.
Everything I publish, in one short daily email. Real numbers, no hype, unsubscribe in one click.
Get paid 100%, on-chain, the second the sale clears
Most affiliates earn little, and that is disclosed up front. The difference here is not a promise about what you will make. It is that you can verify every payout yourself, on a public contract, in about twelve seconds.
See how the payout works →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
What’s missing from ‘both matter equally’ is any discussion of the median outcome for someone who has neither a strong company nor a strong inner circle yet, which describes most people reading a post like this on day one. The post is really describing what separates people who already succeeded, after the fact. It doesn’t tell you what to do when you’re new to both and can’t yet judge which company or which circle is actually any good.
Hector’s right, and let me put the post’s whole point in one sentence: get a good team and a company that doesn’t collapse, and it helps. Anyone could have told you that without four paragraphs about ‘duplicatable systems’ first.
Four paragraphs to say ‘good team, good company.’ That’s the industry in one sentence.
If the inner circle matters as much as the company, why does the post spend three times as many words on the system?
Ivy’s question is the right one. My guess at an answer: the system is the part you can actually sell someone in a blog post, whereas ‘find good people’ isn’t instructions, it’s luck plus years. Around here the inner circle problem solves itself because I already know everybody worth knowing. The system is the part I’d genuinely need help with, same as the post assumes.
Lonnie’s framing is close, but ‘the system is the part you can sell’ cuts both ways — it also means it’s the part that’s easiest to overstate, since nobody in this post gives a number for how much of the outcome the system versus the people versus the company actually explains. If duplication really depends on a good circle as much as the post claims elsewhere, then an automated system should show a measurable difference between teams that have one and teams that don’t, over a comparable time period, not just a claim that it ‘expedites’ things. Without that comparison, ‘automated’ is doing the same rhetorical job as ‘the right people’ — a label for whatever already worked, applied after the fact.