Part of the guide: Network Marketing Lead Generation
Ok, grab a pen…
“Find a people who want a product with high profit margins and repeat purchases, find the best way of selling it to them WITHOUT you being involved in the process at all…”
I just had an orgasm.
(brb)
Ok, got my new shorts on – the cool thing about this method is that once you set it up – people give you money without you doing anything! Now that’s cool!
That means, you can make a ridiculous income, live wherever you want in the world, do what you love, and money just flows into your account on autopilot – with no hard work, effort, or energy involved.
That’s why I like Network Marketing (when done properly)
So here’s the couple of questions I have for you:
- Are you trying to sell something that people just don’t want, or do you just suck at selling it?
- Is there high enough profit in what you do to eventually outsource it so you don’t have to continue managing something for the rest of your life?
- Is there a big enough market to sustain your dream lifestyle?
- If you want – you’re welcome to send money my way, any time – my paypal is zionofenoch@gmail.com
Lol.
In any case – I hope that you take these concepts and make a boat load of cash – the world needs more rich people to create jobs, buy nice stuff, and otherwise show us all what’s possible when the mind of man (or woman) is focused on a singular cause.
To the top,
David Wood
“Rich, Free, and Curly”
Editor notes: “And bald!“
P.S. Leave me your thoughts, comments and questions below.
Comments
Chris, March 4 2011, 19:04
Thanks for yet another value-packed and entertaining post (apart from the part about you shooting your load! LMAO!) Anyway, this is why getting on the front page of Google is so powerful because you can position yourself in front of people who are actively searching. Breaks down so many barriers.
P.S. Hope to see you back in the UK some time in the future. I hear that Numis is launching here so you should come over for a mastermind.
Steven Schmeltzle, March 4 2011, 16:17
This is one of the funniest explanations I have ever read!
You have been paid late before
You have watched the number on the dashboard not match the number in your account. What is different now is simple: it settles on a public contract you can check yourself, not a dashboard I control.
Read the contract →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
David Miller, March 4 2011, 19:16
I have enjoyed yet another great article!
Nate Forrest, March 4 2011, 19:24
Lol. I really liked this one.
Steve Kerr, March 4 2011, 17:21
Hey David, Steve Kerr here from Canada. You got a strong leg growing in Canada, and I need you to come to Canada to have a Super Saturday and crush this City. Will you come?
Samantha Green, March 4 2011 2024, 14:35
This post was incredibly insightful, David! It’s refreshing to read something that simplifies the process of making money in business. I’ve always believed in working smarter, not harder, and your post hits the nail on the head. I’m implementing some of your strategies and can already see the difference. Thank you!
Michael Torres, March 4 2011 2024, 09:47
I have to admit, I’m a bit skeptical about the claims in this post. It seems almost too good to be true. Do you have any case studies or examples of people who have successfully applied these strategies? I’d love to see some concrete evidence before diving in.
Elena Martínez, March 4 2011, 11:22
David, this is an interesting approach to making money. I’m curious about how you handle the initial phase of finding the right product and market. Do you have any tips on conducting market research effectively? Also, how long does it typically take to see results?
Robert Jenkins, March 4 2011 2024, 08:50
While I appreciate the enthusiasm in this post, I think it oversimplifies the challenges of starting and running a business. There’s more to it than just finding a product and automating sales. The complexities of customer service, product quality, and competition are crucial factors that can’t be ignored.
Maria Santos, March 4 2011, 15:05
David! Long time no see. I stumbled upon your post, and it’s great to see you’re still crushing it! How have you been? We should catch up sometime – maybe over coffee if you’re ever in town. Let me know when you’re free!
Antonio Russo, March 4 2011, 13:15
I had a similar experience to what you mentioned in the post. I was stuck in a cycle of working hard with minimal results until I changed my strategy to focus on automation and scalability. It made all the difference! This post really resonated with me. Thanks for sharing!
Jessica Liu, March 4 2011, 10:20
This reminds me of a tool I’ve been using called FunnelPro, which automates the lead generation and sales process. It’s similar to what you’re talking about in this post. I highly recommend checking it out if you’re serious about scaling your business effortlessly.
Benjamin Scott, March 4 2011, 12:45
I just wanted to say thank you for this post, David. It really opened my eyes to a new way of thinking about business. I’ve been so caught up in the grind that I forgot about the importance of smart strategies and automation. I’m excited to put these ideas into practice and see where they take me!
Three posts a day. One email a day.
Everything I publish, in one short daily email. Real numbers, no hype, unsubscribe in one click.
Get paid 100%, on-chain, the second the sale clears
Most affiliates earn little, and that is disclosed up front. The difference here is not a promise about what you will make. It is that you can verify every payout yourself, on a public contract, in about twelve seconds.
See how the payout works →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
The three questions at the end are fine questions. What’s missing is what happens to the person who answers ‘yes’ to all three and still doesn’t make it, because in my experience with loan applications from small business owners, that’s most of them, not the exception. High margin, repeatable purchase, big enough market — plenty of people who can honestly say yes to all three still can’t execute the selling part. Rare isn’t impossible, but this post writes as if it’s normal.
Hector, this is a question I think about often for my own market. High enough profit margins to eventually outsource — this is easier to imagine in a large, single-language economy than in a smaller distribution market like mine, where the customer base for any one product is simply not large, and ‘big enough market’ does not mean the same size everywhere it gets read. I would be interested to know if there are thoughts here for markets outside the largest ones, because the questions themselves are good ones — profit margin, scalability, market size — only the numbers behind each answer change completely depending on where in the world you are standing when you ask them.
Same three questions, same order, every cycle since I started. Rare isn’t the checklist — it’s admitting most people fail two of the three.
The line that stops me is ‘the world needs more rich people… to show us all what’s possible.’ That’s the whole moral case for the business, offered as an aside, in parentheses almost. Worth asking directly: does wanting the product sold have anything to do with whether people’s lives are actually better for having bought it? Hector’s questions are about whether the business works. That one’s about whether it should.
Strongest case against Hector’s read: the three questions are a filter, not a guarantee, and the post never claims otherwise — it says ‘if you want’ at the top, conditional on already having the product and the selling skill sorted. Read charitably, it’s a checklist for someone past the first two hurdles, not a promise to someone still stuck on hurdle one. I don’t fully buy that reading myself, but it’s the version of this post that survives Hector’s objection.
The three questions frame this as a solvable equation, but the post is a clean example of survivorship bias in its purest form: it describes the traits of the businesses that worked, backward, as if they were a formula anyone can apply forward. The academic version of this critique goes back to work on the role of chance in outcomes attributed to skill — worth remembering before treating three yes/no questions as a business plan.