Part of the guide: MLM Reviews: The Honest Index
Someone in your feed went from zero to a six-figure run with MAKE Wellness, and now they want you in before the window closes. Maybe it’s real. The company did cross $100 million fast, and that’s not nothing. But you’re a careful person with money on the line, so you searched for an honest MAKE Wellness review instead of just clicking the link. Good. I’ve built and reviewed network marketing companies for over twenty years. Here’s the straight version: what it is, what the comp plan actually pays, the concerns worth weighing, and the one thing that decides whether you make a dollar.
Let me start with a story, because it’s the exact lens I’m going to hand you.
Back in 2006 I built a real distributorship in a company called Agel. Wellness supplements, founded in late 2005, a slick “Suspension Gel Technology” pitch, led by two of the sharpest names in the business at the time, Eric Worre and Randy Gage. I did well there, and I also did something most distributors never do. I actually counted. And what I found was that across my organization, there were roughly five distributors for every one real customer. Five people getting paid to recruit, for every one person who just wanted the product. I flagged it to corporate, and they were polite. Nothing changed, because the field leaders liked the plan exactly the way it was.
That ratio taught me the only question that matters when you evaluate any of these companies. Not “are the products good.” Not “is the founder impressive.” The question is: does this plan get paid when a customer buys, or when a distributor recruits? Hold that question, because we’re going to run MAKE Wellness through it.
In this guide
What MAKE Wellness actually is
MAKE Wellness is a Utah-based multilevel marketing company that went into prelaunch in August 2024 and opened fully in March 2025. The founder and CEO is Justin Prince, who by his own marketing was a co-creator and top earner at Modere before a falling-out that turned into mutual lawsuits (he sued them, they countersued). He’s joined by Truman Hunt, the former CEO of Nu Skin, and Robert Finigan, Modere’s former chief marketing officer. These are not first-timers; they’ve built large organizations before, and you can feel that professionalism in how clean the launch was.
The growth is the headline, and it’s genuinely impressive. By the company’s own account, documented in a software vendor case study, MAKE went from zero to over $100 million in revenue in under twelve months. Independent industry tracker BusinessForHome estimates roughly $102 million in 2025, up from about $20 million in 2024, a 410% jump that put it near the top of the momentum rankings. When a company moves that fast, two things are usually true at once. There’s a real product people are reordering, and there’s a recruiting wave riding on top of it. Your job is to tell which one is paying you.
The products and the peptide claim
MAKE sells six supplements built around what it trademarks as “Proprietary Bioactive Precision Peptides.” In plain English, plant-derived peptide blends, positioned (carefully, never in so many words) as a natural alternative to the GLP-1 weight-loss injections everyone’s talking about. The line, with current pricing, runs like this:
- Calm ($49.99, 30 sachets) for stress
- Hydrated ($49.99, 30 sachets) for hydration
- Focused ($59.99, 30 capsules) for mental clarity
- Energized ($79.99, 30 sachets) for sustained energy
- Lean ($89.99, 30 capsules) for weight management
- Fit ($119.99, 30 sachets) for recovery and “healthy aging”
The packaging is beautiful and the customer reviews skew positive. People do reorder, which is the single best sign a wellness company isn’t pure recruitment. Here’s the honest caveat a smart buyer needs. The “AI-discovered, precision peptide” language is marketing, not published science. The company cites general peptide research from the 2000s and 2010s, but I could not find a single peer-reviewed study on MAKE’s own formulations. That doesn’t mean the products don’t help people. It means you’re buying a premium-priced supplement on a brand story, not on clinical proof, and at $50 to $120 a box that’s a real consideration. Judge it as a good supplement, not as medicine.
The MAKE Wellness compensation plan, in plain English
This is where educated readers want the mechanics, so here they are without the hype. The plan has fourteen affiliate ranks, all driven by your monthly Personal Volume (PV), climbing from Basic Affiliate up to “40K Premier,” which requires $40,000 in monthly volume. Joining is free now, with no mandatory purchase, which matters and which I’ll come back to. The pay comes from five buckets:
- Circle Sales Bonus: 10% to 40% on your personal volume. This is the “up to 40%” you see in every ad. It’s real, but the top of that range lives at high volume.
- Customer Sales Bonus: 4% to 10% on the sales of affiliates you recruit.
- Affiliate Development Bonus: up to 8% paid across five generational levels of your downline (a standard unilevel).
- Rank Achievement Bonus: one-time payouts from $500 up to $100,000 as your downline hits volume milestones.
- Founders Bonus: a launch incentive running through March 2026, paying early Premier affiliates anywhere from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars.
Now read it through the Agel question. Four of those five buckets pay you for building and advancing a downline. One pays on your own product volume. That tells you what the plan rewards. And here’s a fact most reviews gloss over: MAKE quietly retired its early “income guarantees” (things like $1,500 a month for recruiting three Premier affiliates) in March 2025. If you joined believing those numbers were the deal, they changed on you. I’m not calling that fraud, because comp plans evolve. But it’s the exact thing that erodes trust in this industry, and you deserve to know it happened before you build on the plan.
Tired of plans that change on you after you’ve done the work? There’s a model where every commission settles on a public contract you can read in about twelve seconds, before you trust a word anyone says. See how it works.
See a comp plan you can audit yourself →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
An honest MAKE Wellness review names the concerns
I lead with the good, but a review that skips the hard parts isn’t worth your time. So, fairly and without slurs, here’s what to weigh.
The prelaunch drew a pyramid-scheme accusation. The industry watchdog BehindMLM publicly criticized MAKE’s 2024 prelaunch because the original terms required affiliates to make a personal product purchase to keep their position, with no retail customers in the picture at all. To the company’s credit, they revised the terms within weeks, dropping the mandatory purchase. But they kept a tiered “Founder’s Box” (around $500) that gave buyers earlier selling access than non-buyers, which critics still call pay-to-play. Read that history and decide for yourself how much it bothers you.
The plan tilts toward recruiting. Same flaw I found at Agel, same flaw in most of the industry. The richest rewards come from building a team, not from selling product to people who never join. That’s not illegal and it’s not unique to MAKE. It’s just the structural truth, and it’s why most participants struggle.
The science and the income math behind this MAKE Wellness review
The science is a brand story. Premium prices, trademarked buzzwords, no published trials on the actual products. Fine for a supplement, not proof of a miracle.
The income reality is sobering. That’s not MAKE’s fault; it’s the model. In September 2024 the FTC analyzed 70 MLM income disclosures and found that across the industry, the vast majority of participants made $1,000 or less per year, an average under $84 a month, before counting their expenses. MAKE’s own disclaimer says it plainly: “Most Affiliates earn modest or no income.” One reviewer who priced out staying active landed near $450 a month to keep qualified across product and tools. Run that math honestly: if you spend $450 to earn $84, you don’t have a business. You have a subscription with a dream attached.
I’m not telling you this to talk you out of it. I’m telling you because you’re a capable person who’s been burned by hype before, and the quiet fear underneath your search (“am I about to get played again?”) deserves a straight answer instead of a recruiting pitch.
Who actually wins here
MAKE Wellness can work, and for a specific person it works well. Picture the affiliate who already knows how to generate attention, who can build a real customer base that reorders, and who can enroll and lead a team without chasing friends and family around a barbecue. For that person, a young company with momentum, a clean product, and a founding team that’s scaled before is a legitimate vehicle. There’s a real calm that comes from selling something people actually want and watching reorders show up on their own. That’s the internal win underneath the income. The money matters; the certainty that you built something that holds matters more.
For the person who joins because a friend was excited and figures the company will do the selling, it’s an expensive lesson. The company is not the variable. You are.
The actionable playbook: how you’d really build MAKE Wellness
Say you’ve weighed all of it and you’re in. Here’s how you’d actually build it, in order, the way a producer would. Watch how few of these steps are the company.
- Become a real customer first. Use the products for 60 to 90 days and get a result you can describe honestly. You cannot sell reorders you’ve never experienced, and your belief is the asset, not the brochure.
- Build customers before you build a team. Sign ten retail customers who buy because they want the product, not because they want the business. This is the opposite of what the plan nudges you toward, and it’s exactly why it works. A base of happy customers is the foundation both regulators and reality reward.
- Pick one narrow audience. Not “everyone who wants to feel better.” Try “busy moms over 40 who want a natural alternative to the weight-loss shot.” Speak to one person and the right people lean in.
- Create content daily, on one platform. Short videos that teach one useful thing about energy, sleep, or recovery, not product spam. You’re building attention and trust, which is the actual scarce resource. I’ve watched this single habit, done for years, separate the earners from everyone else.
- Use a capture system, not your DMs. Send interested people to a page that collects a name and a way to reach them, so a follow-up sequence does the heavy lifting while you sleep. This is the difference between a hobby and an engine.
- Only then, recruit, and recruit customers into the business. The best affiliates come from your happiest customers, and recruiting at real scale starts there. Lead with the product, let the business be the upgrade.
- Reinvest a third of every commission into traffic and tools. The two-year plateau breaks when you stop trying to do it all for free and start buying reach. That’s the lever almost nobody pulls.
The verdict
As a company, MAKE Wellness is a legitimate, fast-growing wellness MLM with a capable founding team, a product people reorder, and a comp plan that is no better or worse than the industry standard. It is not a scam by any documented measure, and I won’t call it one, but it’s also not a shortcut. The pyramid criticism in its prelaunch, the recruiting-tilted plan, the brand-story science, and the brutal industry-wide income math are all real, and you should walk in seeing them clearly. If you have a way to generate leads and make sales, MAKE is a fine vehicle. If you don’t, no company on earth will save you.
The part most reviews skip
Here’s the thing. Whether MAKE Wellness works for you has almost nothing to do with MAKE Wellness. I’ve watched two people join the same company in the same month, one get rich and one go broke, and the difference was never the comp plan. It was whether they had a system to generate leads, enroll people, and build a team without depending on chasing their warm market.
Look at the gap honestly: a friend of mine, Aaron Rashkin, once had five thousand active people on his team in one of the largest juice companies in the world, and he was making about four thousand dollars a month. Five thousand people. Four grand. The effort was enormous and the model was broken. Compare that to my own best four weeks from a single downline years ago: $257,000, with zero phone calls and zero meetings, because a system kept producing whether anyone showed up that day or not. Same industry, honestly less effort. The variable was never the company. It was the system behind the person.
That’s what I’d point you to, no matter which company you choose. Not another product, but a system built so the thing that breaks trust in this industry simply can’t happen. Every commission it pays settles on a public smart contract, in USDC, in about twelve seconds, readable by anyone on the blockchain. You don’t take the income on faith. You audit it before you trust a word I say. No comp plan that changes on you after the work is done. No dashboard you have to hope is honest. The contract is the truth. That’s the kind of certainty a careful person actually wants, and it’s the foundation under everything I build now.
Leaders use systems; everyone else joins companies and wonders why the excitement faded by month three.
The company is rarely the variable. The system is. This is the on-chain model I use to generate leads, make sales, and build a team, where every commission is settled on a public contract you can verify yourself in about twelve seconds. Start a rung for a few dollars and see the mechanics before you trust a word I say.
See the system I use →Most participants earn little to nothing. No income is guaranteed. You can verify every payout on the public smart contract.
Independent review. We are not affiliated with MAKE Wellness and earn nothing if you join it. Income disclaimer: most participants in any MLM earn little or nothing, no income is guaranteed, and individual results depend on your own effort, skill, and market conditions. Facts, pricing, and rankings are accurate as of June 2026 and change often, so verify on the live pages. Sources: MAKE Wellness official opportunity page, BehindMLM review, BusinessForHome data, and the FTC’s 2024 MLM income-disclosure report.
See also: the tools and systems I actually recommend, and start here if you’re new to building income online.
Three posts a day. One email a day.
Everything I publish, in one short daily email. Real numbers, no hype, unsubscribe in one click.
The Agel story is the whole review in miniature — a guy actually counts his own downline, finds it wildly recruiter-heavy against genuine customers, flags it, and gets a polite shrug back from corporate. Every company in this space has its own version of that guy and that corporate office.
Declan, this is the part I return to as well, the counting. A company growing this quickly, the way this one has, is very often actually driven by markets outside the country of origin first. The review does not say whether this company has expanded past the US yet. For a business in Turkey, this question decides everything before I even consider the products.
No US company waits long to go international once the growth chart looks like that one.
The strongest case against Elif’s worry: a company that hasn’t expanded past the US yet is arguably safer to evaluate, not riskier. You’re not trying to translate a comp plan across different regulatory regimes before you understand the base version, you’re watching the exact structure this review lays out, the recruiting-weighted buckets, the retired income guarantees, play out in one market where the numbers are actually being tracked and reported. Widen too early and you inherit a second set of unknowns on top of the first. I don’t think that fully answers her, because a market with less regulatory scrutiny could just as easily go the other way, but it’s a better argument than ‘wait and see’ usually gets credit for in threads like this one.
Outside-customer volume, not enrollments, is the one number the review says actually matters. I’d have that on an automatic dashboard from day one, not tracked in my head.
Trina’s dashboard is a good idea, but I keep snagging on something upstream of the tooling entirely. The review says most of the comp buckets pay you for recruiting, not for selling to someone who’ll actually use the product. What kind of person do you become, month over month, optimizing a number that rewards bringing people in over serving the ones already there? That’s not really a business question. That’s a character one, and the review mostly dodges it.